LEXQ is the AI that helps legal teams read contracts at clause level, track regulations across India and abroad, and model litigation risk with the precedent attached — built around the simple truth that legal advice without citation is just opinion.
A quick read of what LEXQ actually does, how it behaves, and how it fits in. The rest of the page goes deeper.
A confident answer without a citation is just an opinion. LEXQ is built so every conclusion ships with the source quoted, the case law referenced, and the jurisdictional caveat noted — the kind a litigator can actually rely on.
A 200-page master agreement lands. LEXQ extracts every clause, compares against your playbook, and surfaces the issues — lopsided indemnities, IP-assignment gaps, governing-law conflicts — with the exact paragraph quoted. The lawyer reviews findings instead of reading 200 pages cold.
Indian statutes, EU regulations, US codes, sectoral rules from RBI, SEBI, IRDAI, FDA, EMA, GDPR, DPDP. Watches for amendments daily, surfaces conflicts between jurisdictions, builds the comparison tables your team would otherwise build by hand.
Quantitative risk modelling for disputes, regulatory actions, IP enforcement — calibrated against actual case-law outcomes by jurisdiction, by judge, by subject matter. Every score is traceable back to the precedents that drive it. The lawyer can defend the number in the room.
Every domain has a regulator. When a rule moves, every domain feels it. LEXQ is the only model whose primary job is to broadcast — one regulatory event flows out to all eleven sibling AIs, each carrying the citation with it.
Where personal data is processed for cross-border purposes, the data fiduciary shall obtain explicit, unbundled consent from the data principal at each new processing context, and shall maintain a verifiable record of the consent for a period of not less than seven years.
What changed: consent must now be re-collected at every new cross-border processing context, with a tamper-proof record kept for seven years. The old single-blanket consent no longer holds.
Patient consent flows refresh
Each cross-border data exchange in patient pathways — international referrals, second opinions, clinical trials — now triggers a fresh consent prompt at the bedside, with the seven-year record kept automatically.
Trial-data sharing tightens
Cross-border trial data movements — sponsors abroad receiving Indian patient records — now require re-consent at each context. NOVA refreshes the trial-pack templates and the audit trail formats overnight.
Cross-border payment data tightens
International remittance flows, NRE-NRO transfers, foreign-investor KYC handoffs — each is a cross-border processing context. VYDE re-architects the consent collection at exactly those touchpoints, audit trail intact.
Checkout consent re-flows
Customer data shared with global payment processors, foreign delivery partners, overseas warehouses — each is a separate context now. ZYNC updates the checkout consent prompts and retains the records for the required seven years.
Viewer-data retention adjusts
Cross-border streaming behaviour — viewers in India watching content hosted on global CDNs, recommendation engines running on overseas infrastructure — trigger fresh consent prompts. MUSE retains the seven-year record for each.
Shipper data flows update
Customs declarations crossing borders, shipper details shared with foreign authorities, driver records flowing to overseas carriers — each is a context. ROAM re-architects the consent capture and the audit log accordingly.
A legal opinion without a citation doesn’t survive a redline. LEXQ is built so every conclusion ships with the source paragraph quoted, the case law referenced, the jurisdictional caveat noted — the kind a litigator would put their name on, and a regulator can verify line by line.
Pulls each clause out of a long agreement, compares against your playbook, scores the risk per clause and per contract. Lopsided indemnities, governing-law conflicts, IP-assignment gaps — every flag comes with the exact paragraph quoted, ready for human review.
Indian statutes alongside EU regulations, US codes, and sectoral rules from RBI, SEBI, IRDAI, FDA, EMA, GDPR, DPDP. Watches for amendments daily, surfaces conflicts between jurisdictions, builds the comparison tables your team would otherwise build by hand.
Risk modelling for disputes, regulatory actions, IP enforcement — calibrated against actual case-law outcomes by jurisdiction, by judge, by subject matter. Every score is traceable to the precedents that drive it. The lawyer can defend the number in the room.
Reviewer-grade clause drafting, redlines, alternative language proposals. Learns your firm’s playbook and the way your team writes, flags the sections it’s less sure about so a senior reviewer can spot-check — instead of cleaning up generic AI prose.
Every other domain has a regulator. When a rule moves, healthcare protocols, pharma submissions, manufacturing audits, financial reporting, retail labelling — everything has to update. LEXQ broadcasts the change to all eleven domains within hours, with the citation attached to each.
Attorney-client privilege isn’t a policy you write up — it’s an architecture you can prove. LEXQ holds privilege boundaries in the platform itself, with explicit work-product flags, ethical walls between conflicting matters, and the audit trail to show every access.
In-house counsel, contract operations, compliance and risk, regulatory affairs, IP and patents, litigation and disputes. Anyone whose work has to survive a partner’s redline, a regulator’s inquiry, or a judge’s scrutiny.
Multi-jurisdiction practice support, daily regulatory monitoring, advisory memos drafted with the citations attached, board-level risk reports. For in-house lawyers who handle cross-border legal work and need to brief a board with the precedent intact.
Reviewing thousands of contracts against playbook standards, generating redlines, surfacing renewals before they auto-extend, analysing the portfolio for systemic risk. For contract ops teams managing 10,000+ live agreements with their CLM as home base.
Tracking regulatory changes across dozens of frameworks, attesting policies on schedule, mapping risk controls, remediating audit findings. For compliance leaders who’d rather catch the rule change in week one than answer for it in a finding three months later.
Tailoring submissions for each agency’s template, drafting responses to queries, tracking post-approval changes, managing correspondence with regulators. For reg-affairs teams across pharma, finance, telecom — where the agency’s preferred wording matters as much as the science.
Portfolio analytics, prior-art searches, freedom-to-operate analysis, infringement risk modelling, licensing economics. For IP teams under the dual pressure of enforcement deadlines and renewal budgets — where missing a date costs more than the lawyer’s annual fee.
eDiscovery support that surfaces the relevant documents, precedent research with the judge’s past rulings cross-referenced, exposure modelling, settlement economics, brief citations generated. For litigators who need analysis they can put their name on in court.
A clause read with the source quoted, a regulation tracked across borders, a risk score that cites its own precedents. Same hub, same privilege walls, every citation recorded.